October Term 2008 · Docket 07-1428

Can a city discard valid test results to avoid a disparate impact claim?

Firefighters challenge a city decision to discard valid promotion tests to avoid a disparate impact claim.

Official caption
Ricci v. DeStefano
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Coleman argued racial classifications are inherently pernicious.

    Mr. Kneedler argued Title VII prohibits discriminatory operations.

    Mr. Meade argued employers must comply with disparate impact provisions.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The city argues it acted to avoid a disparate impact claim. The firefighters argue the city violated their rights by discarding valid results.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on April 22, 2009.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

The city wants to keep the discarded test results.

The firefighters want the court to restore their promotions.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

The city argues it avoided a disparate impact claim.

The firefighters argue the city violated their equal protection rights.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Kennedy asked if the city's choice had a constitutional deficiency.

Justice Stevens asked if the decision was undisputedly race-based.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines when employers can discard valid test results. It balances disparate impact risks against individual rights. The outcome shapes future hiring and promotion practices.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON