SCOTUS Legal Briefs

Arguments on 2006-04-17

Showing 1–2 of 2 cases, newest official Court activity first.

  1. October Term 2005 · Docket 05-259

    Does a Title VII retaliation claim require tangible economic harm?

    Burlington Northern argues that minor workplace reassignments do not constitute actionable retaliation. White contends that such actions violate federal anti-discrimination laws.

    Case
    Burlington N. & S. F. R. Co. v. White
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript

  2. October Term 2005 · Docket 05-83

    Can a judge decide facts that raise a criminal sentence?

    The dispute centers on whether a judge may find facts that increase a sentence beyond the standard range.

    Case
    Washington v. Recuenco
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript