October Term 2023 · Docket 23-250

Does the Self-Determination Act require the government to pay tribes for indirect healthcare costs?

The San Carlos Apache Tribe seeks full reimbursement for indirect costs. The Department of Health and Human Services argues the law limits this payment.

Official caption
Becerra, Sec. of H&HS v. San Carlos Apache Tribe
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Ms. Flynn argued the Act requires IHS to contract with tribes.

    She stated the Act's basic design is simple.

    Mr. Unikowsky argued the Act entitles tribes to recover disputed costs.

    He noted the bulk of disputed costs are indirect costs.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The dispute centers on the Indian Self-Determination Act. The tribe claims the law mandates full cost recovery. The government disputes the scope of this obligation.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on March 25, 2024.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

The tribe wants the government to pay all disputed indirect costs.

The government wants to limit its payment obligation for these costs.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

The tribe argues the Self-Determination Act entitles them to recover these costs.

The government argues the law does not require full reimbursement for indirect expenses.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Kagan asked if tribes must comply with Medicare and Medicaid rules.

Justice Gorsuch asked if the government acts as the payor of last resort.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines federal funding obligations for tribal healthcare. It determines how much money tribes receive for self-governance. It impacts the financial stability of tribal health systems.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON