October Term 2023 · Docket 23-124

Can bankruptcy courts release non-debtor parties from lawsuits?

Creditors seek to sue Purdue Pharma's owners. The company argues the bankruptcy code allows releasing them from liability.

Official caption
Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Curtis Gannon argued for the creditors. He cited a specific victim's experience. He emphasized the need for accountability.

    Daniel Garre argued for Purdue Pharma. He cited the plain text of the statute. He argued the release is legally authorized.

    questions_asked_by_justices

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the scope of bankruptcy law. It asks if a court can shield third parties from lawsuits during a company's reorganization.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on December 4, 2023.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Creditors want to sue Purdue's owners for damages.

Purdue wants to shield its owners from lawsuits.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Creditors argue the bankruptcy code does not allow releasing non-debtors.

Purdue argues the code text permits releasing third parties.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Thomas asked how to narrow the broad statutory language.

Justice Alito asked if Congress should address this problem.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute defines the power of bankruptcy courts. It determines whether companies can shield owners from liability. This affects how creditors recover losses in corporate bankruptcies.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON