October Term 2023 · Docket 22-915

Does the Second Amendment protect a domestic abuser's right to own a gun?

The dispute centers on whether federal law can ban domestic abusers from possessing firearms.

Official caption
United States v. Rahimi
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    General Prelogar stated that guns and domestic abuse create a deadly combination.

    Mr. Wright argued that the government does not rely on analogues for outsiders.

    General Prelogar claimed that Bruen does not require a precise historical analogue.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests the scope of the Second Amendment. It asks if the right to bear arms extends to individuals convicted of domestic violence.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 7, 2023.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

The government wants to keep the ban on domestic abusers owning guns.

The defendant wants the court to strike down the federal ban.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

The government argues that domestic violence poses a specific danger to public safety.

The defendant argues that the law lacks a precise historical analogue.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Barrett asked how the government proves certain behavior is dangerous.

Justice Thomas asked if civil actions differ from criminal proceedings in this context.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines who can legally possess firearms. It balances individual rights against the safety of domestic violence victims. The outcome shapes future gun control laws nationwide.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON