October Term 2023 · Docket 22-913

Does the Fifth Amendment create a direct federal right to sue for property takings?

the sides that brought the case seek a federal damages remedy. Texas argues state law provides the only path.

Official caption
Devillier v. Texas
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    the sides that brought the case claim the Fifth Amendment imposes an explicit duty to pay money.

    Texas asserts its constitution is more protective than the federal one.

    Justice Gorsuch noted the Fifth Amendment may not create an independent cause of action.

    Justice Barrett questioned how the ratifiers viewed the Fifth Amendment as supplying a cause of action.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests whether the Fifth Amendment grants a direct federal right to sue for property takings. the sides that brought the case argue the text creates this duty. Texas claims state law handles these claims.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on January 16, 2024.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want a direct federal damages remedy.

Texas wants to limit claims to state law.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the Fifth Amendment text creates a federal duty to pay.

Texas argues state common law provides the necessary remedy.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Gorsuch asked if the Fifth Amendment creates an independent cause of action.

Justice Thomas questioned the consistency of relying on extra-constitutional causes of action.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

The outcome defines the scope of federal property rights. It determines whether citizens can sue directly under the Constitution. This shapes the balance between federal and state power.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON