October Term 2023 · Docket 22-800

Can the government tax corporate earnings before shareholders receive them?

The Moores argue the tax violates the Constitution. The government says the tax fits the Sixteenth Amendment.

Official caption
Moore v. United States
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  4. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Grossman argued the word income has a fixed meaning. He said it refers to gains coming into the taxpayer.

    Prelogar argued the tax fits the amendment text. She said Congress can tax certain unrealized gains.

    Grossman warned the government view is staggeringly broad. He said it attributes corporate earnings to any shareholder.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests the scope of federal taxing power. It asks if Congress can tax unrealized corporate gains.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on December 5, 2023.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

The Moores want the tax struck down. They argue it violates the Constitution.

The government wants the tax upheld. It argues the tax fits the Sixteenth Amendment.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

The Moores claim income requires personal receipt. They say unrealized gains are not income.

The government claims Congress can tax unrealized gains. It says the amendment allows this power.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked why partners face similar taxes. She questioned the fairness of this attribution.

Justice Barrett asked if the issue is due process. She distinguished this from the definition of income.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the reach of federal tax power. It determines if Congress can tax unrealized corporate gains. The outcome shapes future tax policy and individual liability.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON