October Term 2023 · Docket 22-585

Which due process standard governs civil forfeiture hearings?

the sides that brought the case seek the Mathews standard for process. the opposing sides argue Barker controls the timeline.

Official caption
Culley v. Marshall
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    the sides that brought the case claim Mathews is the correct default standard.

    the opposing sides cite historical statutes to support their position.

    Justices questioned the purpose of post-seizure hearings.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests which legal standard judges use to review civil forfeiture process.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 30, 2023.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want courts to apply the Mathews standard.

the opposing sides want courts to apply the Barker standard.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue Mathews is the default civil due process standard.

the opposing sides argue history and precedent support the Barker standard.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked if summary judgment resolves custody issues.

Justice Thomas asked if early summary judgment would change the outcome.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

The choice of standard dictates how quickly courts must resolve property claims. This affects how long owners wait for their property. It shapes the balance between government power and private rights.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON