October Term 2023 · Docket 22-500

Does federal law override state rules on yacht insurance claims?

A yacht insurer and a boat owner dispute which state's law governs a denied claim.

Official caption
Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Jeffrey Wall argued federal law enforces maritime forum selection clauses.

    Wall cited prior Court holdings on federal maritime policy exceptions.

    Wall stated the boat is available for sale online for half a million dollars.

    Bashman responded to the insurer's arguments with multiple counterpoints.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests whether federal maritime law controls the outcome of a yacht insurance dispute. The insurer argues federal rules apply. The owner argues state law applies.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 10, 2023.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

The insurer wants the Court to apply federal maritime law to the dispute.

The owner wants the Court to apply state law to the dispute.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

The insurer argues federal law enforces forum selection clauses in maritime contracts.

The owner argues state law governs the specific insurance claim details.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Kavanaugh asked if sophisticated parties often choose neutral forums without substantial connections.

Justice Alito noted old maritime law can be harsh regarding fire extinguisher requirements.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the boundary between federal and state law in maritime insurance. It determines which legal rules apply to yacht disputes. It affects how insurers handle claims for vessel maintenance failures. It clarifies the scope of federal maritime policy.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON