October Term 2022 · Docket 21-1164

Does the Quiet Title Act's 12-year limit bar federal courts from hearing property claims?

the sides that brought the case argue the time limit is not jurisdictional. The government claims it strips court power.

Official caption
Wilkins v. United States
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. McCoy argued Congress must clearly state when a time bar is jurisdictional.

    Mr. Snyder argued prior cases treated the time bar as a jurisdictional limit.

    Justice Thomas asked if conditions to sovereign immunity waivers are jurisdictional.

    Justice Jackson asked why a definitive interpretation matters for the case.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests whether a 12-year limit in the Quiet Title Act removes federal court power. the sides that brought the case want to keep their property claim alive. The government wants the claim dismissed as too late.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 30, 2022.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want the court to hear their property claim.

The government wants the court to dismiss the claim.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue Congress did not clearly make the time limit jurisdictional.

The government argues the time limit restricts court power.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Alito asked if the Court once tied sovereign immunity to jurisdiction.

Justice Sotomayor asked if a judge tries Quiet Title actions.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute defines when federal courts lose power over property claims. It shapes how long citizens can challenge government land ownership. It clarifies the scope of sovereign immunity waivers.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON