October Term 2021 · Docket 20-659

Does a favorable termination require proof of innocence?

the side that brought the case argues a case ends favorably when prosecution fails. the opposing side argues it requires an affirmative finding of innocence.

Official caption
Thompson v. Clark
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Ali argued that the Second Circuit's requirement for an affirmative finding of innocence is wrong.

    Mr. Ali stated that a proceeding ends favorably when the prosecution fails to obtain a conviction.

    Mr. Ellis argued that the claim is analogous to a malicious prosecution claim.

    Mr. Ellis noted that common law purposes include avoiding inconsistent criminal and civil judgments.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the standard for ending a criminal case in a plaintiff's favor. The dispute centers on whether a civil claim requires proof of innocence or merely the failure to convict.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 12, 2021.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the side that brought the case wants the Court to accept that a failed prosecution satisfies the favorable termination element.

the opposing side wants the Court to require an affirmative finding of innocence to satisfy the element.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the side that brought the case argues that the failure to obtain a conviction ends the proceeding in the accused's favor.

the opposing side argues that the proceeding must affirmatively indicate the accused is innocent to terminate favorably.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Thomas asked whether a Fourth Amendment seizure supports a malicious prosecution claim.

Justice Alito asked why a termination element applies to an unreasonable seizure claim.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

The standard determines when a civil claim can proceed after criminal charges end. A lower standard allows more suits to move forward. A higher standard blocks suits unless innocence is explicitly found.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON