October Term 2021 · Docket 20-1566

Does the FSIA require foreign states to face the same liability as private citizens?

The dispute centers on whether foreign states must meet the same legal liability standards as private individuals.

Official caption
Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Ms. Hansford argued Congress created a clear liability standard for foreign states.

    She stated foreign states must be liable like private individuals under like circumstances.

    Mr. Boies responded to questions about the applicability of Spanish law.

    He acknowledged the potential loss if courts applied Spanish law identically to private persons.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. It asks if foreign states face identical liability rules as private parties.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on January 18, 2022.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Cassirer wants the Court to apply private citizen liability standards to the foreign state.

Thyssen-Bornemisza wants the Court to reject the private citizen analogy for foreign states.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Cassirer argues Congress directed foreign states to be liable like private individuals under like circumstances.

Thyssen-Bornemisza argues the private citizen analogy fails for unique sovereign actions like managing an army.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked if the parties hold different positions on the issue.

Justice Alito asked why the advocate downplayed the Rules of Decision Act argument.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

The outcome defines the legal standard for holding foreign states liable in U.S. courts. It clarifies the scope of sovereign immunity protections. It impacts how victims seek redress against foreign governments.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON