October Term 2021 · Docket 20-1312

Does Medicare count only patients with active benefits?

Hospitals argue the law counts all indigent patients. The government argues it counts only those with active benefits.

Official caption
Becerra v. Empire Health Foundation
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Bond argued the statute directs counting entitled patients.

    Mr. Hettich argued the agency violated clear congressional instructions.

    Justice Roberts noted Congress was frustrated with agency actions.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests how to read a Medicare payment formula. The formula counts patient days for people entitled to benefits. The dispute centers on who qualifies as entitled.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 29, 2021.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Hospitals want the law to count all indigent patient days.

The government wants the law to count only days with active benefits.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Hospitals argue the statute plainly requires counting all indigent patients.

The government argues the phrase for such days limits the count.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked if the government relies on deference.

Justice Thomas asked how to define entitled without a statutory definition.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute determines how hospitals receive federal payments. It affects funding for care of low-income patients. It clarifies the scope of Medicare reimbursement rules.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON