October Term 2021 · Docket 20-1034

Must courts weigh safety measures before denying child return?

the sides that brought the case seek a final denial of return. the opposing sides demand a safety review first.

Official caption
Golan v. Saada
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Ms. King argued the convention does not bind courts to return a child once grave risk is met.

    Mr. Liu stated the Second Circuit requires considering the full range of safety measures in every case.

    Mr. Min argued the convention's text and purpose require considering reasonable safety measures in complex cases.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The Hague Convention governs international child abductions. A grave risk exception allows courts to deny return. The dispute centers on whether courts must evaluate safety measures before applying this exception.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on March 22, 2022.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want a final denial of the child's return.

the opposing sides want courts to evaluate safety measures first.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the convention allows denial once grave risk exists.

the opposing sides argue the convention requires considering reasonable safety measures.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Chief Justice Roberts asked if a simple grave risk case allows immediate denial.

Justice Breyer asked if the term ameliorative measures was the correct legal standard.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the scope of the grave risk exception. It determines how courts balance child safety against parental rights. The outcome shapes future international custody disputes.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON