October Term 2021 · Docket 19-1392

Does the Constitution protect a woman's right to choose abortion before viability?

Mississippi seeks to ban most pre-viability abortions. Women's health advocates argue this ban violates constitutional precedent.

Official caption
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Scott Stewart argued Roe and Casey have no constitutional basis.

    Elizabeth Prelogar argued the Constitution protects a woman's right to end a pregnancy before viability.

    argument_summary

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the scope of constitutional abortion rights. It challenges the legal foundation of prior Supreme Court decisions.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on December 1, 2021.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Mississippi wants the Court to allow states to ban most pre-viability abortions.

Jackson Women's Health wants the Court to strike down the Mississippi ban.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Mississippi argues Roe and Casey lack constitutional basis and harm democratic process.

Jackson Women's Health argues the Constitution protects a fundamental right to pre-viability abortion.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Thomas asked if focusing on privacy or autonomy changes the analysis.

Justice Breyer asked if the side that brought the case accepts the special rule for overturning precedent.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

The outcome defines the legal status of pre-viability abortion access nationwide. It determines whether states can prohibit these procedures. It shapes the scope of individual bodily autonomy rights.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON