October Term 2020 · Docket 20-334

Who decides appellate costs when a court splits its ruling?

San Antonio argues the district court must decide costs. Hotels.com argues the appellate court must decide them.

Official caption
San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L.P.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Geyser argued the district court should decide costs.

    Mr. Salmons argued the appellate court must decide costs.

    chief_justice_roberts_noted_courts_follow_different_practices.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The dispute centers on which court decides who pays appellate costs when a panel splits its ruling.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on April 21, 2021.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

San Antonio wants the district court to decide costs after the mandate issues.

Hotels.com wants the appellate court to decide costs immediately.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

San Antonio argues Rule 39 delegates cost decisions to the district court.

Hotels.com argues Rule 39 assigns cost decisions to the appellate court.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Thomas asked why San Antonio did not object earlier.

Justice Alito asked if courts can apportion costs proportionately.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines which court controls cost allocation in split appellate decisions.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON