October Term 2020 · Docket 19-897

Which statute controls detention during withholding proceedings?

the sides that brought the case argue Section 1226 governs their detention. the opposing sides argue Section 1231 applies to their status.

Official caption
Pham v. Guzman Chavez
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Hughes argued Section 1226 governs detention in this context.

    Mr. Suri argued Section 1231 text supports the current detention.

    Justice Roberts questioned the distinction between where and whether removal occurs.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case concerns the legal basis for detaining non-citizens. The parties dispute which statute applies during specific proceedings. The outcome affects detention authority and release standards.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on January 11, 2021.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want the Court to apply Section 1226 standards.

the opposing sides want the Court to apply Section 1231 standards.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue Section 1226 governs detention during withholding proceedings.

the opposing sides argue Section 1231 text covers their specific status.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Breyer asked about the percentage of individuals who remain.

Justice Thomas asked for clarification on the scope of review.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

The choice of statute defines detention limits. It determines release standards for these individuals. It clarifies the scope of executive detention power.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON