October Term 2020 · Docket 19-123

Does a city violate free exercise rights by denying a religious agency a foster care contract?

Catholic Social Services seeks a contract to place children. Philadelphia denies it because the agency rejects same-sex couples.

Official caption
Fulton v. Philadelphia
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    The agency claims the city failed to tolerate its religious practice.

    The city claims it only asks agencies to evaluate couples neutrally.

    The city argues the agency holds delegated government power.

    The agency argues lower courts misapplied existing free exercise law.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

Catholic Social Services wants a city contract to place foster children. The city denies the contract because the agency rejects same-sex couples.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 4, 2020.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Catholic Social Services wants a contract to place foster children.

Philadelphia wants to deny the contract to the agency.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

The agency argues the city violated its free exercise rights.

The city argues the agency must evaluate all couples equally.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

How many same-sex couples did the agency deny?

Does the city require the agency to endorse marriage?

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the limits of religious freedom in government contracts. It affects how cities manage foster care programs. It balances religious beliefs against equal treatment.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON