October Term 2019 · Docket 19-431

Can religious employers opt out of contraceptive coverage rules?

Religious groups seek exemptions from federal contraceptive coverage mandates.

Official caption
Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    General Francisco stated the 2011 mandate sparked years of litigation.

    Mr. Clement noted the government initially exempted churches.

    Mr. Fischer claimed the exemption rules rest on sweeping assertions.

    Justice Ginsburg emphasized Congress's instruction for seamless coverage.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the scope of religious exemptions in health insurance rules.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on May 6, 2020.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want exemptions from contraceptive coverage requirements.

the opposing sides want seamless, no-cost coverage for all women.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the mandate violates their religious beliefs.

the opposing sides argue the exemptions exceed agency authority.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Why does the RFRA exemption reach beyond self-certification concerns?

What standards govern when agencies can make exceptions?

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute defines the balance between religious liberty and access to healthcare. It determines how broadly agencies can grant exemptions from federal mandates. The outcome shapes future interactions between faith-based organizations and government regulations.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON