October Term 2019 · Docket 19-177

Does the anti-prostitution policy apply to foreign affiliates without formal corporate ties?

The dispute centers on whether a U.S. law requires foreign affiliates to adopt an anti-prostitution policy when they lack formal corporate ties to the domestic recipient.

Official caption
Agency for Int’l Development v. Alliance for Open Society Int’l, Inc.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    The government contends the Leadership Act targets the HIV/AIDS pandemic. It asserts the policy applies to entities sharing a name and logo with the domestic recipient.

    The nonprofit argues the record shows its foreign affiliates suffer First Amendment harms. It claims the policy forces them to adopt a specific viewpoint.

    questions_asked_by_justices

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case involves a conflict over the scope of a federal anti-prostitution policy. The government argues the policy applies broadly to affiliates. The nonprofit argues the policy violates free speech rights of its foreign partners.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on May 5, 2020.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

The government wants the Court to uphold the policy's application to foreign affiliates.

The nonprofit wants the Court to strike down the policy as applied to its foreign partners.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

The government argues the policy applies to entities sharing a brand and mission with the domestic recipient.

The nonprofit argues the policy causes First Amendment harms to its foreign affiliates.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Chief Justice Roberts asked if it is reasonable to insist on formal corporate ties in this context.

Justice Ginsburg asked why the statute exempts certain international organizations from the policy requirement.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

The outcome determines whether foreign nonprofits must adopt specific political policies to receive U.S. aid. It defines the boundary between domestic funding conditions and international free speech rights.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON