October Term 2019 · Docket 18-328

Does the FDCPA limitations period start when a violation occurs or when it is discovered?

The dispute centers on whether the FDCPA statute of limitations begins when a violation occurs or when it is discovered.

Official caption
Rotkiske v. Klemm
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Gant argued the case involves the Court and Congress. He emphasized the FDCPA context.

    Mr. Bond stated the Third Circuit decided the discovery rule question. He focused on the specific legal issue.

    Mr. Dvoretzky argued Congress set the start date. He claimed the clock begins at the violation.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests the FDCPA limitations period start date. the sides that brought the case seek a discovery rule. the opposing sides argue the clock starts at the violation.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 16, 2019.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want a discovery rule for the FDCPA. They argue the clock starts when the violation is discovered.

the opposing sides want the clock to start at the violation. They argue Congress set this specific start date.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the FDCPA implies a discovery rule. They claim this aligns with equitable principles.

the opposing sides argue the FDCPA text sets the start date. They claim the clock begins when the violation occurs.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Kavanaugh asked if the discovery rule is equitable. He questioned if common law discovery equals equitable discovery.

Justice Sotomayor asked if the sides that brought the case create a fourth equitable doctrine. She referenced equitable tolling and estoppel.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

The outcome defines the FDCPA limitations period start date. It clarifies the relationship between the Court and Congress. It sets a standard for consumer debt collection cases.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON