October Term 2018 · Docket 17-532

Can a state ban hunting on land a tribe reserved for that purpose?

Wyoming claims a treaty right to hunt expired. The hunter argues the tribe kept that right forever.

Official caption
Herrera v. Wyoming
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Hicks says the tribe reserved hunting rights in 1868.

    Mr. Liu says the lower court decision should be overturned.

    Mr. Knepper says this case matches a 25-year-old dispute.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests if a state can stop a person from hunting on land a tribe reserved for that purpose.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on January 8, 2019.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

The hunter wants to keep hunting on the ceded land.

Wyoming wants to ban hunting on that land.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

The hunter argues the tribe reserved hunting rights forever.

Wyoming argues the tribe lost that right long ago.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Alito asks if the state can argue on remand.

Justice Sotomayor asks when the tribe forfeited its rights.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute defines who controls hunting rights on vast public lands. It shapes the balance between state power and tribal sovereignty.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON