October Term 2018 · Docket 17-1657

Can a bankruptcy trustee reject a trademark license?

The dispute centers on whether a debtor can abandon a trademark license during bankruptcy proceedings.

Official caption
Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Ms. Spinelli explained that Section 365 lets the trustee decide on contract assumption.

    Mr. Tripp argued that trademarks differ from other intellectual property rights.

    Justice Sotomayor noted that Section 365(n) is not the default rule for IP.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the scope of a bankruptcy trustee's power to reject executory contracts. The core conflict involves the interaction between bankruptcy law and intellectual property rights.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on February 20, 2019.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Mission Product Holdings wants the trustee to reject the trademark license.

Tempnology wants the license to survive the bankruptcy process.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Mission Product Holdings argues Section 365 allows the trustee to reject any executory contract.

Tempnology argues trademark law grants specific rights that bankruptcy law cannot override.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Kagan asked which law identifies the principle in question.

Justice Sotomayor questioned why the current rule applies to trademarks specifically.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This issue determines the stability of trademark licenses during corporate financial distress. It affects how businesses manage intellectual property assets in bankruptcy.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON