October Term 2018 · Docket 17-1299

Can states sue other states in federal court?

California seeks to sue Hyatt in federal court. Hyatt argues state courts must handle such disputes.

Official caption
Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Hyatt
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    California argues Nevada v. Hall allows federal court suits.

    Hyatt argues the Constitution bars suits in other states' courts.

    Justice Sotomayor questioned the reliance on legislative history.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

California wants to sue Hyatt in federal court. Hyatt wants the case to stay in state court.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on January 9, 2019.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

California wants to sue Hyatt in federal court.

Hyatt wants the case to stay in state court.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

California argues states can sue other states in federal court.

Hyatt argues states cannot be sued in other states' courts.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked what is new in the argument.

Justice Sotomayor asked about the constitutional design of state power.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines where states can sue other states. It affects how states protect their citizens from other states.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON