October Term 2018 · Docket 17-1104

Do manufacturers owe a duty to warn about asbestos added later?

The dispute centers on whether equipment makers must warn users about asbestos added by third parties.

Official caption
Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    the sides that brought the case argue manufacturers are not liable for injuries caused by third-party goods.

    the opposing sides argue this is a failure to warn case under tort law principles.

    argument

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the scope of manufacturer liability for third-party modifications.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 10, 2018.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want the Court to limit liability for third-party additions.

the opposing sides want the Court to hold manufacturers liable for foreseeable asbestos use.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue manufacturers lack a duty to warn about later asbestos additions.

the opposing sides argue manufacturers must warn because their products require asbestos for use.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked if the injury was foreseeable to the manufacturer.

Justice Ginsburg asked if the product required asbestos to function properly.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the boundary of manufacturer responsibility for third-party modifications.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON