October Term 2017 · Docket 17-965

Does the President have authority to restrict entry beyond Congress's statutory framework?

Hawaii argues the entry ban conflicts with congressional law and the Constitution. The government claims it serves national security needs.

Official caption
Trump v. Hawaii
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Hawaii's lawyer argued the order violates the Constitution.

    The government's lawyer cited a multi-agency security review.

    Justices questioned the scope of presidential authority.

    Hawaii's lawyer claimed the order discriminates by nationality.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests presidential power over immigration. Hawaii seeks to block the entry restrictions. The government defends the proclamation as lawful.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on April 25, 2018.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Hawaii wants the Court to strike down the entry restrictions.

The government wants the Court to uphold the entry restrictions.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Hawaii argues the order conflicts with Congress's immigration laws.

The government argues the order follows a multi-agency security review.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked where the President gets authority beyond Congress's decisions.

Justice Ginsburg noted Congress is responsible for making immigration laws.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the limits of presidential power over immigration. It determines whether the executive can override congressional statutes. The outcome shapes future national security policies.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON