October Term 2017 · Docket 16-969

Can the Patent Board decide only some patent claims in a review?

SAS Institute argues the Board must decide every challenged claim. The government says it may decide only some.

Official caption
SAS Institute Inc. v. Matal
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Castanias argued the statute requires full decisions.

    Mr. Bond argued the Board has discretion to decide partially.

    questions_asked_by_justices

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

SAS Institute seeks a full decision on all claims. The government defends partial decisions.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 27, 2017.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

SAS Institute wants the Board to decide every challenged claim.

The government wants the Board to keep deciding only some claims.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

SAS Institute argues the statute requires decisions on all claims.

The government argues the Board may issue partial decisions.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked what SAS Institute specifically challenges.

Justice Ginsburg asked about the statutory text on institution.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the scope of patent reviews. It affects how patent owners defend their rights. It shapes the power of the Patent Board.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON