October Term 2017 · Docket 15-1439

Can state courts hear securities class actions with federal claims?

the sides that brought the case want federal courts to handle these suits. the opposing sides want state courts to keep them.

Official caption
Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Katyal argued Congress reacted to a new problem.

    He said plaintiffs shifted litigation to state court.

    Mr. Kedem argued SLUSA reestablished federal venue.

    He said it did so by permitting removal.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act. It asks if state courts can hear large securities class actions. The law aims to move these cases to federal courts. The dispute centers on the statute's text. It defines covered class actions. It excludes certain federal claims. The parties disagree on this exclusion's meaning.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 28, 2017.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want federal courts to hear these suits.

the opposing sides want state courts to keep these suits.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue SLUSA bars state court jurisdiction.

the opposing sides argue SLUSA only allows removal to federal court.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Ginsburg asked if Congress used obtuse language.

Justice Sotomayor asked about the definition of covered actions.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines where large securities suits belong. It shapes access to state and federal courts. It affects how investors seek redress. It clarifies the balance of judicial power.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON