October Term 2015 · Docket 15-674

Can states sue to block a federal policy that defers deportation?

Texas claims a federal deportation-deferral policy harms it. The federal government says the state lacks legal standing to sue.

Official caption
United States v. Texas
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    General Verrilli argued the policy defers removal for parents of citizens.

    Mr. Keller argued the policy is an unprecedented unlawful assertion of power.

    Mr. Saenz argued the policy protects mothers of U.S. citizens.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

Texas argues the federal policy unlawfully expands executive power. The federal government argues the policy is lawful and the state cannot sue.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on April 18, 2016.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Texas wants the Court to block the federal deportation-deferral policy.

The federal government wants the Court to allow the policy to continue.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Texas argues the policy is an unlawful assertion of executive power.

The federal government argues the policy is lawful and the state lacks standing.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Chief Justice Roberts asked if Texas would sue if the policy changed to avoid injury.

Justice Kennedy asked if the federal government could say the issue is not for the state to decide.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the limits of state power to challenge federal immigration policies. It determines whether states can block federal actions they claim cause harm.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON