October Term 2015 · Docket 15-274

Do Texas abortion clinic rules create undue burdens?

Clinics argue Texas rules block access. Texas argues the rules protect health.

Official caption
Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Ms. Toti argued the Texas requirements undermine the Casey balance.

    General Verrilli argued the Texas law effects are more extreme than prior cases.

    Mr. Keller argued the sides that brought the case try to upset the Casey balance.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

the sides that brought the case want the Court to strike down two Texas clinic rules. They claim these rules create substantial obstacles to abortion access. the opposing sides want the Court to uphold the rules. They claim the rules serve legitimate state health interests.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on March 2, 2016.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want the Court to invalidate the Texas clinic rules.

the opposing sides want the Court to keep the Texas clinic rules in force.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the rules undermine the balance struck in Casey.

the opposing sides argue the rules protect women's health and safety.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Chief Justice Roberts asked what evidence supports the sides that brought the case' claims.

Justice Ginsburg asked if the surgical center claim is distinct from prior litigation.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the scope of state power to regulate abortion clinics. It determines how much access women have to reproductive care. It shapes the legal standard for evaluating clinic safety rules.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON