October Term 2015 · Docket 15-233

Can Puerto Rico Restructure Public Utility Debts?

Puerto Rico seeks to restructure utility debts. Lenders argue federal law blocks this.

Official caption
Puerto Rico v. Franklin Cal. Tax-Free Trust
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Landau argued Congress stripped Puerto Rico of restructuring tools.

    Mr. McGill stated Congress withdrew Chapter 9 power in 1984.

    justice_breyer_questioned_statutory_text

    justice_ginsburg_questioned_contract_clause

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

Puerto Rico wants to restructure utility debts. Lenders want to keep full payment.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on March 22, 2016.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Puerto Rico wants to restructure utility debts.

Lenders want to enforce full contract payment.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Puerto Rico argues federal law allows restructuring.

Lenders argue the Contract Clause blocks changes.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Breyer asked where the statute includes Puerto Rico.

Justice Ginsburg asked about the Contract Clause bar.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines Puerto Rico's debt restructuring power. It affects essential utility services for residents.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON