October Term 2015 · Docket 15-138

Does civil RICO cover foreign injuries?

The European Community seeks damages for tobacco harm abroad. RJR Nabisco argues the law only covers domestic injuries.

Official caption
RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Ms. Goldenberg argued Section 1962 affects government prosecutions.

    Mr. Katsas stated the Second Circuit extended RICO to foreign claims.

    Mr. Frederick noted the EU sued for actions in the U.S.

    Justice Breyer questioned the purpose of including foreign acts in RICO.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests whether civil RICO applies to foreign injuries. The European Community wants compensation for harm in Europe. RJR Nabisco wants the claim dismissed. The Second Circuit allowed the foreign claim. the sides that brought the case ask the Court to reverse that ruling.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on March 21, 2016.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

The European Community wants damages for foreign injuries.

RJR Nabisco wants the foreign claim dismissed.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

The European Community argues RICO covers foreign injuries.

RJR Nabisco argues RICO covers only domestic injuries.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Breyer asked why Congress included foreign acts in RICO.

Justice Ginsburg asked if the statute implies domestic injury.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the geographic reach of civil RICO. It determines whether foreign victims can sue in U.S. courts. It affects how companies face liability for global conduct. It shapes the balance between domestic and foreign legal claims.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON