October Term 2015 · Docket 14-844

How much do prisoners pay to appeal?

Prisoners dispute whether they must pay all district court fees before paying appeal fees.

Official caption
Bruce v. Samuels
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Shelley argued the per-prisoner approach fits the text.

    Ms. Saharsky argued the statute views each case separately.

    Justice Ginsburg asked about cost awards after a loss.

    Justice Scalia questioned the disincentive for filing many cases.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case asks how the Prison Litigation Reform Act calculates fees for appeals.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 4, 2015.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want to pay appeal fees before finishing district court fees.

the opposing sides want prisoners to finish district court fees first.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the law supports paying fees per prisoner.

the opposing sides argue the law requires full payment of prior fees.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Ginsburg asked if appeal fees wait for district fees.

Justice Scalia asked if filing many cases avoids paying fees.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute changes how much money prisoners pay to sue.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON