October Term 2015 · Docket 14-840

Can FERC regulate retail electricity demand as part of wholesale rates?

The dispute centers on whether federal rules for wholesale demand response unlawfully control retail electricity prices.

Official caption
FERC v. Electric Power Supply Assn.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    General Verrilli argued the Federal Power Act expressly authorizes FERC to regulate wholesale rate processes.

    Mr. Phillips argued economic principles support the Commission's approach to demand response.

    Mr. Clement represented the Electric Power Supply Association and other power generator organizations.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued rules for wholesale demand response. These rules allow utilities to pay customers to reduce peak usage. The Electric Power Supply Association challenged these rules. They argued the rules intrude on state authority over retail rates.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 14, 2015.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

The Commission wants the Court to uphold its wholesale demand response rules.

The Association wants the Court to strike down the rules as exceeding federal power.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

The Commission argues the Federal Power Act authorizes regulating wholesale rate-setting processes.

The Association argues the rules effectively regulate retail rates, which states control.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Scalia asked if FERC can strip its own power by yielding to state vetoes.

Justice Scalia questioned whether paying people not to use electricity falls within FERC's power.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the boundary between federal wholesale regulation and state retail control. It determines who sets the rules for peak electricity demand. The outcome shapes how utilities manage grid reliability and consumer costs.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON