October Term 2015 · Docket 14-8349

Did prosecutors strike black jurors based on race?

The dispute centers on whether prosecutors used race to exclude jurors.

Official caption
Foster v. Chatman
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    the side that brought the case's counsel claimed prosecutors targeted black jurors.

    The state's counsel argued the side that brought the case bears the burden of proof.

    Justice Kennedy questioned the nature of the legal bar involved.

    Justice Alito inquired about the scope of state court review.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the limits of federal review for state habeas claims.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 2, 2015.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the side that brought the case seeks a new trial based on racial bias.

The state seeks to uphold the conviction and deny relief.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the side that brought the case argues prosecutors intended to strike all black jurors.

The state argues the side that brought the case failed to prove clear error.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Kennedy asked if the res judicata bar is a state law question.

Justice Alito asked how the court handles short state opinions.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the standard for proving racial bias in jury selection.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON