October Term 2015 · Docket 14-723

Can a health plan recover a settlement after the beneficiary spends it?

A health plan seeks to recover a settlement after the beneficiary spent the money.

Official caption
Montanile v. Board of Trustees of Nat. Elevator Industry Health Benefit Plan
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Stris argued an equitable lien applies only to specific property.

    Mr. Katyal noted the beneficiary signed a reimbursement agreement.

    Ms. Anders argued Congress limited remedies for plan breaches.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case involves a dispute over a settlement payment. The beneficiary spent the funds. The plan wants the money back.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 9, 2015.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

The plan wants the beneficiary to repay the spent settlement funds.

The beneficiary wants to keep the spent settlement funds.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

The plan argues the beneficiary agreed to repay the settlement.

The beneficiary argues the plan cannot recover spent funds.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Kagan asked if the beneficiary kept the money in a specific account.

Justice Kennedy asked if spending a mistaken bonus is generally accepted.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines when a health plan can recover spent settlement funds. It affects how beneficiaries manage settlement payments. It clarifies the scope of equitable liens in health plans.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON