October Term 2015 · Docket 14-520
Do guarantors count as applicants under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act?
The dispute centers on whether the law protects guarantors from credit discrimination.
Verified source milestones
- — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
The arguments, in order
This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.
Argument 1 ·
What happened at the argument
Mr. Duggan stated that joint debtors are applicants under the law.
Mr. Mcallister argued that the agency cannot rewrite the statute.
Justice Scalia questioned if a recommendation letter writer is an applicant.
Justice Scalia asked if the agency can define the term applicant.
Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details
Sources used for this argument breakdown
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 14, lines 12-30 — Transcript, file page 14, lines 12-30
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 20-50 — Transcript, file page 3, lines 20-50
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 52-8 — Transcript, file page 3, lines 52-8
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 8-18 — Transcript, file page 3, lines 8-18
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 30, lines 6-32 — Transcript, file page 30, lines 6-32
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 44-46 — Transcript, file page 4, lines 44-46
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 50-4 — Transcript, file page 4, lines 50-4
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 14-18 — Transcript, file page 5, lines 14-18
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 22-24 — Transcript, file page 5, lines 22-24
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 50-4 — Transcript, file page 5, lines 50-4
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 24-28 — Transcript, file page 6, lines 24-28
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 8-12 — Transcript, file page 6, lines 8-12
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 10-16 — Transcript, file page 7, lines 10-16
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 38-50 — Transcript, file page 8, lines 38-50
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 14-18 — Transcript, file page 9, lines 14-18
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 4-6 — Transcript, file page 9, lines 4-6
A citizen's guide to the whole case
What this case is about
Hawkins v. Community Bank of Raymore asks if guarantors qualify as applicants under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The lower court ruled against the sides that brought the case. The Supreme Court will review this legal interpretation.
Official sources for this section
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 14, lines 12-30 — Transcript, file page 14, lines 12-30
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 20-50 — Transcript, file page 3, lines 20-50
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 30, lines 6-32 — Transcript, file page 30, lines 6-32
How the case got here
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 5, 2015.
Official sources for this section
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 8-18 — Transcript, file page 3, lines 8-18
What each side wants
the sides that brought the case want the Court to rule that guarantors are applicants under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
the opposing sides want the Court to rule that guarantors are not applicants under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Official sources for this section
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 14, lines 12-30 — Transcript, file page 14, lines 12-30
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 20-50 — Transcript, file page 3, lines 20-50
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 30, lines 6-32 — Transcript, file page 30, lines 6-32
What each side says
Mr. Duggan argues that joint debtors are applicants under the statute.
Mr. Mcallister argues that the agency cannot rewrite the statute to exclude guarantors.
Official sources for this section
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 14, lines 12-30 — Transcript, file page 14, lines 12-30
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 20-50 — Transcript, file page 3, lines 20-50
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 30, lines 6-32 — Transcript, file page 30, lines 6-32
What the justices asked
Justice Scalia asked if a recommendation letter writer is an applicant.
Justice Scalia asked if the agency can define the term applicant.
Official sources for this section
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 52-8 — Transcript, file page 3, lines 52-8
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 44-46 — Transcript, file page 4, lines 44-46
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 50-4 — Transcript, file page 4, lines 50-4
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 14-18 — Transcript, file page 5, lines 14-18
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 22-24 — Transcript, file page 5, lines 22-24
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 50-4 — Transcript, file page 5, lines 50-4
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 24-28 — Transcript, file page 6, lines 24-28
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 8-12 — Transcript, file page 6, lines 8-12
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 10-16 — Transcript, file page 7, lines 10-16
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 38-50 — Transcript, file page 8, lines 38-50
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 14-18 — Transcript, file page 9, lines 14-18
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 4-6 — Transcript, file page 9, lines 4-6
Why it matters
This case defines who receives federal protection from credit discrimination. It determines the scope of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. It affects how banks treat guarantors in loan agreements.
Official sources for this section
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 14, lines 12-30 — Transcript, file page 14, lines 12-30
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 20-50 — Transcript, file page 3, lines 20-50
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 30, lines 6-32 — Transcript, file page 30, lines 6-32
What happens next
This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.
Official sources for this section
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 52-8 — Transcript, file page 3, lines 52-8
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 8-18 — Transcript, file page 3, lines 8-18
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 44-46 — Transcript, file page 4, lines 44-46
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 50-4 — Transcript, file page 4, lines 50-4
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 14-18 — Transcript, file page 5, lines 14-18
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 22-24 — Transcript, file page 5, lines 22-24
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 50-4 — Transcript, file page 5, lines 50-4
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 24-28 — Transcript, file page 6, lines 24-28
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 8-12 — Transcript, file page 6, lines 8-12
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 10-16 — Transcript, file page 7, lines 10-16
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 38-50 — Transcript, file page 8, lines 38-50
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 14-18 — Transcript, file page 9, lines 14-18
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 4-6 — Transcript, file page 9, lines 4-6
Official Court provenance
Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page
Title and summary sources
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 14, lines 12-30 — Transcript, file page 14, lines 12-30
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 20-50 — Transcript, file page 3, lines 20-50
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 30, lines 6-32 — Transcript, file page 30, lines 6-32
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 14, lines 12-30 — Transcript, file page 14, lines 12-30
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 20-50 — Transcript, file page 3, lines 20-50
- Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 30, lines 6-32 — Transcript, file page 30, lines 6-32
Revision history
- Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·
Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.
- Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·
Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.