October Term 2015 · Docket 14-1504

Does race drive Virginia redistricting?

Appellants claim race drove district lines. Virginia says politics did.

Official caption
Wittman v. Personhuballah
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Appellants argue race predominated in the map. They cite a 55 percent floor. They claim this moved 44,000 voters.

    Virginia argues the legislature treated districts equally. They claim they preserved district cores. They deny racial predominance.

    Justice Sotomayor questioned the case's standing. She asked if the map changed meaningfully. She noted the new map splits fewer districts.

    Justice Kennedy asked about using race. He questioned moving people for ease. He noted the race votes for one party.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

Appellants want the Court to reverse the lower court. They argue race drove the map. Virginia wants the Court to affirm the lower court. They argue politics drove the map.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on March 21, 2016.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Appellants want the Court to reverse the lower court. They argue race drove the map.

Virginia wants the Court to affirm the lower court. They argue politics drove the map.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Appellants argue a 55 percent floor moved voters. They claim this triggered strict scrutiny.

Virginia argues the legislature treated all districts equally. They claim no racial predominance occurred.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked if the case is moot. She noted most districts did not change.

Justice Kennedy asked if race can move people. He questioned using race for neutral goals.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines when race drives redistricting. It sets limits on state map drawing. It affects how states use racial data.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON