October Term 2015 · Docket 14-1095

Does a jury verdict bind the court when the jury instruction was wrong?

The dispute centers on whether a conviction stands if the jury followed an erroneous instruction.

Official caption
Musacchio v. United States
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    the side that brought the case claims the jury instruction was obviously erroneous.

    The government asserts the jury found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

    justice_question

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case asks if a conviction survives when the jury instruction was legally incorrect.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 30, 2015.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the side that brought the case wants the conviction overturned due to the erroneous instruction.

The government wants the conviction upheld based on the jury's verdict.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the side that brought the case argues the erroneous instruction infected the jury's decision.

The government argues the jury found the required elements beyond a reasonable doubt.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Ginsburg asked what else the jury needed to find unanimously.

Justice Scalia questioned if the jury's finding of guilt on both elements suffices.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines how courts review jury verdicts when instructions contain legal errors.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON