October Term 2014 · Docket 13-1074

Does the Federal Tort Claims Act time limit allow equitable tolling?

The government argues the statute bars late claims. The plaintiff argues fairness allows an extension.

Official caption
United States v. Kwai Fun Wong
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Martinez argued the text and history show Congress wanted a strict bar.

    Mr. Schnapper noted two different background rules are at issue here.

    justice_questions

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests whether a strict time limit in the Federal Tort Claims Act allows courts to extend deadlines for good cause.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on December 10, 2014.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

The government wants the time limit to be absolute.

The plaintiff wants the court to allow a late filing.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

The government argues the text makes the deadline jurisdictional.

The plaintiff argues fairness principles should apply to the deadline.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Ginsburg asked why a 1972 statute differs from later laws.

Justice Kagan asked if the argument applies to other time limits.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute defines when courts can extend strict filing deadlines for tort claims.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON