October Term 2014 · Docket 12-1226

Does a pregnancy accommodation law require equal treatment for non-pregnant workers?

Peggy Young seeks a lifting restriction accommodation. UPS denies it because she is pregnant. The law requires equal treatment for similar conditions.

Official caption
Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Young's counsel argues the law aims to keep women in the workforce.

    UPS's counsel argues the law does not mandate specific accommodations for pregnancy.

    Justices question how to apply the law to different employee groups.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

Peggy Young worked at UPS. She needed a lifting restriction due to pregnancy. UPS denied the request. Other workers with similar restrictions received accommodations. Young sued for discrimination. The lower court ruled against her. She now asks the Supreme Court to review the case.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on December 3, 2014.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Young wants the Court to rule that UPS must accommodate her pregnancy.

UPS wants the Court to rule that it can deny accommodations to pregnant workers.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Young argues the Pregnancy Discrimination Act requires equal treatment for similar conditions.

UPS argues the law does not require accommodations for pregnant workers if others are treated differently.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Breyer asks how to distinguish this case from other employment scenarios.

Justice Scalia asks if the law requires giving benefits to all pregnant employees.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines employer obligations for pregnant workers. It affects workplace accommodation policies nationwide. It clarifies the scope of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. It impacts hiring and retention practices for women.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON