October Term 2013 · Docket 13-461

Does Aereo's cloud TV service count as a public performance?

Broadcasters claim Aereo's cloud TV service violates copyright law. Aereo argues its technology avoids public performance rules.

Official caption
American Broadcasting Co. v. Aereo, Inc.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Paul Clement argued Aereo's model enables strangers to watch live TV online.

    Clement stated Congress passed a statute that forecloses Aereo's legal argument.

    Aereo's counsel argued the service is not a public performance under the law.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

Aereo uses tiny antennas to stream live TV to subscribers. Broadcasters say this is a public performance. Aereo says it is private viewing.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on April 22, 2014.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Broadcasters want the Court to find Aereo liable for copyright infringement.

Aereo wants the Court to find its service is not a public performance.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Broadcasters argue Aereo's service is the functional equivalent of a public performance.

Aereo argues its technology allows private viewing without public performance.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked how the ruling applies to services like Dropbox.

Justice Breyer suggested the Court might remand the case for further review.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the scope of public performance rights. It determines how cloud-based media services operate legally. It affects the balance between copyright holders and technology providers.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON