October Term 2013 · Docket 13-316

Does bank fraud require intent to defraud the bank itself?

The dispute centers on whether a defendant must intend to defraud a bank or if intent to defraud a third party suffices when bank funds are involved.

Official caption
Loughrin v. United States
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Russell argued the statute requires intent to defraud a bank.

    Mr. Yang argued the statute covers schemes affecting banks indirectly.

    questions_and_answers

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the scope of federal bank fraud statutes. It asks if the law covers schemes targeting third parties that indirectly affect banks.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on April 1, 2014.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the side that brought the case wants the Court to require specific intent to defraud a bank.

The government wants the Court to accept intent to defraud a third party as sufficient.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the side that brought the case argues Section 1344 requires intent to defraud the bank directly.

The government argues the statute covers schemes that affect banks through third parties.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Alito asked if clause (2) covers representations made to others.

Justice Ginsburg asked if two checks were paid by the drawing bank.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This defines the reach of federal bank fraud laws. It determines which financial schemes face federal prosecution. It impacts how prosecutors charge check fraud cases.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON