October Term 2013 · Docket 12-138

Who decides if a treaty precondition exists?

BG Group and Argentina dispute who decides if a treaty precondition exists.

Official caption
BG Group plc v. Republic of Argentina
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    BG Group argues the treaty creates a standing offer to arbitrate.

    Argentina argues this is a contract formation issue for courts.

    questions

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests who decides if a treaty precondition exists.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on December 2, 2013.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

BG Group wants an arbitrator to decide the precondition.

Argentina wants a court to decide the precondition.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

BG Group argues the treaty creates a standing offer to arbitrate.

Argentina argues this is a contract formation issue for courts.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked if consent determines the decision-maker.

Justice Alito asked if U.S. law applies to the arbitration.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute defines the boundary between courts and arbitrators. It shapes how investors enforce treaty rights. It impacts global investment stability.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON