October Term 2013 · Docket 12-1315

Does laches bar copyright claims filed within the statute of limitations?

the side that brought the case argues laches cannot bar timely copyright claims. the opposing side argues laches bars the suit despite timeliness.

Official caption
Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    the side that brought the case's counsel argued the Court never applied laches to federal limitations periods.

    the opposing side's counsel argued the lower courts correctly applied laches to bar the suit.

    The Solicitor General argued the 1957 amendment did not abrogate laches.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The dispute centers on whether the equitable doctrine of laches can dismiss a copyright infringement suit filed within the statutory deadline. the side that brought the case contends the statute of limitations controls. the opposing side argues laches independently bars the claim.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on January 21, 2014.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the side that brought the case wants the Court to reverse the dismissal and allow the copyright claims to proceed.

the opposing side wants the Court to affirm the dismissal and bar the copyright claims entirely.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the side that brought the case argues laches cannot constrict a federal statute of limitations.

the opposing side argues laches bars the suit even if filed within the statutory period.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Scalia asked if a statute of limitations makes a party scot-free within the period.

Justice Breyer asked if rules that increase the statute of limitations also apply here.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case determines whether copyright holders can delay filing suit indefinitely. It defines the boundary between statutory deadlines and equitable defenses. It affects how courts handle stale copyright claims.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON