October Term 2012 · Docket 12-52

Does federal trucking law preempt state car storage rules?

A used car dealer and a car owner dispute federal preemption of state storage laws.

Official caption
Dan's City Used Cars, Inc. v. Pelkey
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    The dealer argued federal law preempts state storage rules.

    The owner argued state law governs the storage dispute.

    questions_asked_by_justices

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests if federal trucking deregulation overrides state car storage rules.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on March 20, 2013.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

The dealer wants the federal law to block state storage rules.

The owner wants state law to govern the car storage dispute.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

The dealer argues federal law preempts state storage regulations.

The owner argues state law controls the storage dispute.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Breyer asked how state towing laws survive federal preemption.

Justice Scalia questioned the distance between the case and preemption.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

The outcome defines the boundary between federal trucking law and state property rules.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON