October Term 2012 · Docket 11-982

Can a trademark owner end a lawsuit by promising not to sue?

Nike argues a broad promise to stop suing ends the legal dispute. Already, LLC argues the promise leaves real harm and uncertainty.

Official caption
Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Ms. Anders argued a trademark holder can end a case with a broad promise.

    She said the voluntary cessation doctrine should guide the analysis.

    Mr. Dabney asked if any covenant could make a competitor feel secure.

    He suggested no written promise might provide total security.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

Nike wants the Court to accept a broad promise to stop suing as a final fix. Already, LLC wants the Court to reject that promise as insufficient. The dispute centers on whether a voluntary stop in enforcement ends a legal case.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 7, 2012.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Nike wants the Court to accept its broad promise to stop suing as a final fix.

Already, LLC wants the Court to reject that promise as insufficient to end the case.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Nike argues a broad promise to stop suing eliminates the legal controversy.

Already, LLC argues the promise leaves real harm and uncertainty for competitors.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Kennedy asked if demanding marketing plans from competitors is injurious.

Justice Kennedy asked if the claim of high costs is in the record.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines when a promise to stop suing ends a lawsuit. It affects how companies protect trademarks. It shapes the balance between legal certainty and competitive freedom.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON