October Term 2012 · Docket 11-1231

Can hospitals extend Medicare claim deadlines?

Hospitals seek to file late claims. The government insists strict deadlines apply.

Official caption
Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical Center
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Kneedler argued the deadline is absolute.

    Mr. Manning argued the deadline allows equitable tolling.

    questions_asked_by_justices

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

Auburn Regional Medical Center filed Medicare claims late. The government rejected them. Auburn argues the deadline is flexible. The government argues the deadline is absolute.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on December 4, 2012.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Auburn wants to recover payment for late claims.

The government wants to deny payment for late claims.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Auburn argues the deadline allows equitable tolling.

The government argues the deadline is jurisdictional.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked if equitable tolling applies to jurisdictional limits.

Justice Alito asked if hospital sophistication affects deadline compliance.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines Medicare claim deadlines. Hospitals rely on these rules for revenue. The government relies on them for budget control. Clear rules prevent administrative chaos.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON