October Term 2011 · Docket 11-88

Does the Torture Victim Protection Act cover corporate entities?

the sides that brought the case seek damages from a foreign government. the opposing sides argue the statute only covers natural persons.

Official caption
Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Fisher argued Congress created a specific statutory cause of action.

    Ms. Ferguson stated the term individual is unambiguous in U.S. law.

    Mr. Gannon argued the ordinary meaning limits scope to natural persons.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests the scope of the Torture Victim Protection Act. the sides that brought the case want to sue a foreign authority. the opposing sides argue the law limits liability to individuals.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on February 28, 2012.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want to hold a foreign authority liable for damages.

the opposing sides want the Court to limit liability to natural persons.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the statute allows suits against foreign entities.

the opposing sides argue the word individual excludes corporate entities.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked if legal representatives can be corporate entities.

Justice Sotomayor noted the statute uses the word person elsewhere.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines who can face liability under federal law. It clarifies the scope of civil remedies for human rights abuses. It impacts how victims seek compensation from foreign actors.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON