October Term 2011 · Docket 10-507

Does the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act cover land-based injuries?

A worker injured on dry land seeks compensation under federal offshore law.

Official caption
Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP v. Valladolid
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Paul Clement argued the statute does not cover dry land injuries.

    He stated the answer to the legal question is no.

    Justice Scalia asked for examples of shelf injuries not from operations.

    Justice Roberts asked where the state offshore limit falls under the definition.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests the scope of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act. It asks if this statute covers injuries that happen on land.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 11, 2011.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Pacific Operators Offshore wants the Court to reject the worker's claim.

Valladolid wants the Court to uphold his right to compensation.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Pacific Operators Offshore argues the statute only covers offshore operations.

Valladolid argues the injury resulted from offshore work activities.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Ginsburg asked how many accountants work on platforms.

Justice Kennedy asked if substantial time offshore defines the worker's status.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the boundary between land and offshore legal protections. It determines which workers receive federal compensation for injuries. The outcome shapes liability for offshore energy companies.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON